Is the government of the United States of America bound to treaty?
Yes, the government of the United States of America is bound to treaties.
Here's a detailed explanation:
1. Treaties as Supreme Law of the LandUnder the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article VI, Section 2), all treaties made under the authority of the United States "shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding". This means that once ratified, a treaty theoretically overrides any conflicting state laws or even state constitutional provisions. The adoption of a treaty whose stipulations are inconsistent with a state law is considered "equivalent to the repeal of such law".
2. Obligation to Observe Treaties (Pacta Sunt Servanda)International law dictates that "Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith". This principle, known as pacta sunt servanda, means that a treaty engagement is not merely a moral obligation but creates a legally binding obligation on the parties. A state that has contracted a valid international obligation is bound to make necessary modifications in its legislation to ensure the fulfillment of those obligations. A party "may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty".
3. Treaty-Making Authority and ProcessThe President has the power to make treaties "by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, provided two thirds of the senators present concur". This power of negotiating and contracting public treaties between nations is inherent to sovereignty. The United States, as a sovereign, has this power. The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed through ratification, approval, or acceptance; merely signing a treaty is generally not enough to bind the State.
4. Judicial Enforcement and InterpretationU.S. courts, both state and federal, are obligated to judicially notice all treaties of the United States and inform themselves of their provisions, including historical data necessary for their interpretation and enforcement. When a treaty affects the rights of parties litigating in court, the treaty binds those rights and is regarded by the Supreme Court as much as an act of Congress. Whenever a right grows out of or is protected by a treaty, "it prevails against all laws, or decisions of the courts of the States, and whoever may have the right under the treaty, is protected".
5. Limitations and Specific Considerations
- Congressional Power: The ability of an Indian tribe to make a treaty with the United States does not exempt that tribe from the legislative power of Congress. Congress can extend its legislative control over tribes, even if treaties guarantee political independence, with such breaches of faith being a matter for the conscience of legislators, not judicial cognizance.
- Governmental Immunity: While governments are generally immune from suit, the United States consents to be sued in certain circumstances. The "Clearfield Doctrine" asserts that governments "descend to the level of a mere private corporation" when dealing with "private corporate commercial paper" (like Federal Reserve Notes) and lose their sovereign immunity for purposes of suit. In such instances, they are viewed as entities separate from government.
- Territorial Acquisition: The power of the United States to acquire territory by treaty and legislation is affirmed, and such annexed territory may be incorporated into the U.S. or held as a dependency outside the direct application of some constitutional prohibitions, depending on the political departments' decision.
- Unconstitutional Treaties: While there are no express limitations on the U.S. treaty power beyond general constitutional prohibitions (e.g., against taxing exports or taking property without compensation), it would not extend to authorizing what the Constitution forbids, changing the character of the government or a state, or ceding state territory without consent. A treaty that conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens) is void.
In summary, the United States government is indeed bound by treaties, which hold a supreme legal status within its domestic legal system and create binding obligations under international law, subject to specific constitutional limitations and international legal principles.