(a) "Governments descend to the level of mere private corporations and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen when it comes to private corporate commercial paper, such as Federal Reserve Notes, and securities like checks. For purposes of suit, these corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." This is highlighted in cases like Bank of United States v. Planter's Bank, 9 Wheaton (22 U.S.) 904, 6 L. Ed. 24; U.S. v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242; and In re King - Porter Co., CA 5th, 1971, 446 F.2d 722, 732. Furthermore, according to 22 U.S.C.A. 286(e), the real party in interest is not the de jure "United States of America" or "State," but rather entities like "The Bank" and "The Fund" (22 U.S.C.A. 286, et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103). (b) "Governments lose their immunity and descend to the level of private corporations when engaging in commercial activities that enforce negotiable instruments such as fines, penalties, assessments, bails, and taxes. The remedy lies in the hands of the state and its municipalities seeking resolution." Referencing Rio Grande v. Darke, 167 P. 241, we see this principle in action. (c) "Governments are corporations," as established in Penhallow v. Doane, 3 Dallas 55. (d) Importantly, private corporations and their officers are not immune from civil damages. (e) When any USD is invoked, or demanded, invoking HJR 192 overrides existing systems, rendering all instruments as "bogus financial instruments". Those enjoined in the fraud could face prosecution under various statutes such as conspiracy (18 U.S.C. Sec 371), mail fraud (18 U.S.C. Sec 1341), and more, as demonstrated in United States v. Uullman, 187 F.3d 816 (8th Cir. 1999); United States v. Hanzlicek, 187 F.3d 1228, 1230 (10th Cir. 1999); United States v. Wells, 163 F.3d 889 (4th Cir. 1998); and United States v. Stockheimer, 157 F.3d 1082 (7th Cir. 1998). (f) The political, colorable, corporate "State" is absent from the Holy Bible; however, the term 'State' is derived from the Greek root word "stato," meaning "to stand." A State signifies something that is stationary and established, a concept that exists solely in collective thought as a "legal fiction." This fiction is consistent with equity, illustrating how a State, viewed as a corporate entity, exists only in the minds of people, much like an allodial American national identification card or an allodial travel card—concepts born of human imagination. Therefore, similar to the Moorish national ID, everything from corporations to states is merely a constructed notion, reflecting neither the natural nor a tangible reality. It has no physical form, identity, or emotional capacity. (4) Corporations can never hold sovereign power; they remain fictitious entities existing only on paper. (5) Thus, all laws generated by these governmental corporations essentially represent private corporate regulations disguised as public law, statutes, codes, or ordinances to conceal their actual essence. Are the Judge and your lawyer aware of this deception? Absolutely, they are. (8) The enforcement of these improper corporate statutes by local, state, and federal law enforcement officers amounts to unlawful actions against the sovereign public; these officers risk personal liability for such actions as established in Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000. (6) Since these governmental bodies lack true sovereign status, they are incapable of promulgating or enforcing criminal laws. They are only empowered to create and uphold civil laws, which are mandated to comply with the law of contracts requiring signed written agreements and full transparency. Have you ever consented to being arrested or tried under any of their corporate statutes? Moreover, did you ever agree to contract with them by tacitly consenting to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? One ought not to benefit from their own wrongdoing. 2 And. 38, 40. Remember the Constitution for the United States of America, 1791. (g) "The principles of estoppel apply against the state as well as individuals" as noted in Cal. v. Sims, 32 C3d 468. (a) Amendment IX states, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." (b) Amendment X holds, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
